Research Without a Hero

Recently, I wrote about the astonishing (well, it should be astonishing) story of Herbert Mayes’ “biography” of Horatio Alger, Alger: A Biography Without a Hero. So enamored was I that I searched for a copy of the book, finding a 1978 reprint with a new Introduction by Mayes himself and an Afterword by Jack Bales, who would soon be working on The Lost Life of Horatio Alger, Jr. with Gary Scharnhorst, the book that first alerted me to the story. What’s even better is that the book is signed by both Mayes and Bales (and the publisher). Of course, I bought this treasure.

In his Introduction, Mayes writes that his book, on first publication:

was not accepted for what it was: a deliberate, complete fabrication, with virtually no scintilla of basis in fact. Any word of truth in it got in unwittingly. I made it up out of nothing. Most of the few facts I uncovered were intentionally distorted. But the book was regarded then, with no known exceptions, as a genuine biography. (ii-iii)

Wow. As a result, as Bales writes in the Afterword:

The greatest obstacle to studying the life of Horatio Alger, Jr. is the fact that most of what has been published about the author since Herbert R. Mayes’ work appeared in 1928 is fictitious. (242)

Not even the debunking that has occurred, starting in the early 1970s, has managed to derail the misinformation:

But writers, I am sure, will continue to perpetuate these absurd myths. In 1974 I was asked to write a short piece on the Mayes book for the Journal of Popular Culture [Jack Bales, “Herbert R. Mayes and Horatio Alger, Jr.; Or the Story of a Unique Literary Hoax,” Journal of Popular Culture, 8(Fall, 1974), 317-319]. One can imagine my disgust when recently in the same journal I read an article on Alger based almost entirely on Mayes’ fiction [Eric Monkkonen, “Socializing the New Urbanites: Horatio Alger Jr.s’s Guidebooks,” Journal of Popular Culture 11 (Summer, 1977), 77-87]. It is obvious that the fallacies which have been so repeated and accepted for five decades will be related again and again in future years. (244-245)

The elegance of the internet is that it can stop such things. The absurdity of the internet is that it perpetuates such things.

The determination of fact or fiction, then, is the responsibility of each of us. Our research tools alone won’t suffice. Only care, learning, and constant attention can do that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s